Home > Writing and Speaking > What are main reasons to look for the appropriate Course of action for a Historic Property?

What are main reasons to look for the appropriate Course of action for a Historic Property?

A certified Historic Restoration and Preservation Contractor is able to choose the appropriate strategy for a historic building or landscape is crucial.


Preservation focuses on the constant maintenance and repair. Effecting the existing historic materials plus the retention of your property’s form as it has changed with time.
Rehabilitation acknowledges the need to alter or increase a historic property to meet continuing or changing uses while retaining the property’s historic character.
Restoration depicts a house at the particular time period. In the history while removing proof of other periods.
Reconstruction re-creates vanished or non-surviving servings of a property for interpretive purposes.

The Historical Restoration Contractor can suggest the most appropriate course of action or collection of treatment.

It will largely rely on various factors. Included are the property’s historical significance and shape. Plus the proposed use, and intended interpretation. restoration and preservation are employed for instance below. The decision-making process will be similar for other property types.
What’s the relative importance ever?

May be the building nationally significant? Could it be a rare survivor or the work of an master architect or craftsman? Did an important event take place in it?

National Historic Landmarks, are designated for his or her “exceptional significance in American history,” or many buildings individually listed in the National Register often warrant Preservation or Restoration.

Buildings that give rise to the need for a historic district. But aren’t individually listed in the National Register more often undergo Rehabilitation for any compatible new use.
The historic restoration contractor will look into the shape.

Exactly what is the existing condition? The a higher level material integrity, in the building prior to work? Gets the original form survived largely intact or has it been altered with time? Are the alterations an important part of the building’s history?

If distinctive materials, features, and spaces are essentially intact. And provide the building’s historical significance. Preservation will be the appropriate plan of action.

When the building requires more extensive repair and replacement. Or maybe alterations and additions are essential for any new use, then Rehabilitation is among the most appropriate treatment.
Exactly what is the Proposed use?

A vital, practical question must is: Will the structure be harnessed for it had been historically or will it be given a new use? Many historic buildings may be adapted for brand spanking new uses without seriously damaging their historic character. However, special-use properties like grain silos, forts, ice houses, or windmills could be extremely difficult to adjust to new uses without major intervention and a resulting loss of historic character and in many cases integrity.
Mandated building code requirements.

Regardless of treatment, code requirements will need to be taken into account. But if hastily or poorly designed and executed the code-required work may jeopardize a building’s materials in addition to its historic character.

Thus, if a building must be seismically upgraded, modifications towards the historic appearance should be as minimal as possible. The abatement of lead paint and asbestos from historic buildings requires particular care, knowledge, and equipment. If important historic finishes aren’t to be adversely affected.

And finally, alterations and new construction had to meet accessibility requirements underneath the American Disabilities Act of 1990. An ADA update should be made to minimize material loss and visual change to a historic building whenever possible.
For more info about why preserve historic buildings check out this resource

You may also like...

Leave a Reply